just checked the multi vitamin I take and it has all the ingredients u list in the product B , and I mean everyone that u list, so how is product b anything but a multivitamin????
ta 65 reviews: Is it worth it? Expert, third party review.
If you are reading ta 65 reviews, you’ve either look for ways to age gracefully, or you’re intrigued as the the best way to slow down the process.
You’ve probably some of the ta 65 reviews and you’re wondering if its the most effective way support youthful aging.
Reading these ta 65 reviews, you also may be wondering if there are any more effective proven products that serve the same function.
Keep reading to find out what the top researcher & chief consultant to TA Sciences since they discovered ta 65 has gone on to discover and create. All I can say is it is exciting and I have definitely upgraded from ta 65.
Simply put, telomeres protect chromosomes.
Chromosomes are basically long, organized strands of DNA and proteins found in your cells. These strands dictate all the processes that occur in your cells. The proper placement and functioning of chromosomes can predispose people to a normal, healthy functioning body. Chromosomes also have hereditary indicators that play important roles in the development of a person.
At each end of every chromosome strand, you have a telomere. Think of telomeres like bookends. Much like bookends are used to hold a row of books upright and in place on a shelf, our telomeres keep the chromosomes safe and intact. Telomeres keep the chromosomes from becoming frayed, from fusing into rings, or binding with other DNA. Other ta 65 reviews probably won’t tell you it was designed to aide in these functions. Always consider the source you take advice from ; )
While looking at ta 65 reviews, considering whether or not its worth it, its also important to truly grasp what cellular aging really means.
Cells keep our body going. They supply us energy, regenerate to heal our wounds, and are the foundation of our organs. With such an important role, you can see how keeping cells functioning in top form as long as possible is vital to healthy living. When cells are no longer able to replicate, the body’s ability to defend and repair itself, this leaves you vulnerable to the complications of aging.
Do any of the TA 65 reviews suggest the supplement really assists in replication?
To understand the aging process, it’s important to take a look at the cellular level to discover exactly how our cells age, and what impacts the aging process.
The first big piece is looking at how effective TA 65 is in battling free radicals.
Every day, free radicals are formed inside our bodies through standard, necessary chemical reactions. We also absorb free radicals through pollution, UV radiation, x-rays, second hand smoke, and through our own actions from stress, smoking, and weight gain.
Over-exposure to free radicals damages not only our cells’ ability to function properly, but also the integrity of our cells’ overall composition. This results the following generation’s cells that are less healthy and less productive than the ones they came from. As we age, the number of mistakes incurred by daily cellular reproduction increases. The body actually creates nonfunctional cells, leading to more rapid deterioration of the body’s functions. As this process goes on, it creates an increase in oxidative stress.
The next big piece in understanding cellular aging as you are reading ta 65 reviews, is increased oxidative stress.
Our bodies are constantly reacting with the air we breathe. We take in oxygen, as well as tons of other pollutants and toxins in our environment. As we breathe and eat, our body utilizes the oxygen and food to help create energy. The energy creating process, as well as the pollutants in our environment, create highly reactive molecules. These molecules are called free radicals. When free radicals interact with other molecules within the cellular structure, damage to proteins, membranes and DNA can occur.
Oxidative stress occurs when there is an imbalance in a cell’s production and handling of free radicals and its natural ability to repair the damage caused by the exposure. Telomere shortening is accelerated by oxidative stress and inflammation. Both of these processes are affected by diet and lifestyle. Thus, its important when looking at ta 65 reviews, to examine at how effective it is at battling oxidative stress. The secret will be in how many active ingredients ta 65 has that do this.
With a few exceptions, the natural process for human growth and healing involves cells dividing. Cells divide primarily to grow or heal the body by replacing worn out cells with new cells.
Telomeres play an important role in cell division. Each time a cell divides, the DNA unwraps and the information in the DNA is copied. When the cell is finished dividing, the DNA comes back together and telomeres re-assume their protective roles at the ends of the chromosomes.
Unfortunately, telomeres lose a little bit of length each time this happens, like a pencil eraser gets shorter each time it’s used. So as you read ta 65 reviews, you’re most likely wondering if it really helps in the process of strengthening cell division more than the other proven product on the market that we’ve discovered.
Scientists have noticed that cells stop replicating when telomeres become too short. Without adequate telomere protection, essential parts of the DNA can be damaged in the replication process. In humans, a cell replicates approximately 40-60 times before the telomeres become too short. This limit is called the Hayflick Phenomenon (or limit). Research has shown the more a cell divides, the shorter the telomeres get, and the less time the cell will be productive and able to divide.
The majority of the work is done by the body’s own master antioxidant, glutathione, and antioxidant enzymes including glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase. Its essential to find food sources containing these. When telomeres shorten and fray, recent research suggests that these antioxidant defenses diminish and protection against free radicals goes down.
Does ta 65 prevent this?
Fortunately, emerging research reveals we may be able to influence cellular aging processes in positive ways. This may affect how efficiently cells repair and replicate themselves, which affects your health, well-being and the aging process in various ways.
What we did find was that many of these nutrients and compounds were not found in our ta 65 reviews.
Fortunately we did discover another alternative that appears to be a far superior alternative to ta 65, and a much more affordable one for those desiring to feel younger again. Before we get there, its important we highlight this recent research so you can make your own decision.
With the recent surge of interest in telomere shortening as an underlying cause of aging, it’s no wonder scientists are enthusiastically researching how diet and lifestyle can influence telomere length. Now, Ligi Paul, Ph.D., of the USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, has reviewed the latest literature associating telomere length with nutrients, bioactive compounds, and lifestyle factors.
Telomeres protect the ends of chromosomes from fusing with each other, Dr. Paul reminds us, and their length is an indicator of biological aging. Although shortening is a normal part of aging, oxidative stress and inflammation definitely speed up the process of telomere shortening.
“Of interest to nutritionists, telomere length has been shown to be associated with nutritional status in human and animal studies. Healthy lifestyles and diets are positively correlated with telomere length,” Dr. Paul wrote. According to his review, the most recent studies have found that the following nutrients influence telomere length:
* Folate – This B vitamin is important for DNA and RNA structure and function.
* Vitamin B12 – In conjunction with folate, this B vitamin is important for the methylation, or detoxification, of homocysteine. Higher levels of homocysteine are associated with increased oxidative stress.
* Niacin (nicotinamide) – Can influence telomere length through its multiple regulatory and coenzymatic activities.
* Vitamin A and beta-carotene – These antioxidants reduce concentrations of harmful signaling molecules and increase beneficial ones to help reduce oxidative stress.
* Vitamin D – Higher levels of vitamin D lower levels of c-reactive protein (CRP), a protein with harmful effects and associated with shortened telomere length. Vitamin D appears to inhibit some of CRP’s harmful effects.
* Vitamins C and E – These antioxidant vitamins are widely acknowledged for limiting oxidative stress and its damage on DNA and telomeres.
* Magnesium – The mineral required for the activity of a number of enzymes involved in DNA replication and repair. Low amounts of this mineral are also associated with higher concentrations of CRP.
* Zinc – This mineral is necessary for a variety of enzymes including DNA polymerases, which are important for DNA and telomere maintenance.
* Iron – In contrast to the other nutrients, iron supplementation is associated with shorter telomeres. This is likely because of iron’s pro-oxidant ability to stimulate free radical generation. While iron supplements may increase oxidative stress, iron from diet or multivitamins (containing less iron) is not negatively associated with telomere length.
* Curcumin and turmeric – Turmeric, and its primary component curcumin, are common dietary spices that stimulate synthesis of antioxidants, thereby protecting against oxidative stress. Mice fed diets containing curcumin had a trend for longer telomeres compared with controls.
* Long-chain omega-3 fatty acids (fish oil) – Higher plasma levels of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) may protect against oxidative stress by enhancing activity of the antioxidant enzymes superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase.
* Polyphenols – Polyphenols from grape seed and green tea provide additional protection for DNA and telomeres from oxidative stress. Those who drink tea regularly have longer telomeres while mice fed grape seed polyphenols had longer telomeres compared to controls.
Upon further investigation, our ta 65 reviews show that it doesn’t contain any of these proven organic botanicals proven to lengthen telomeres.
In addition to natural ingredients that support telomere length, the key is the natural activation of telomerase in the human body. Dr. Bill Andrews and his team at Sierra Sciences were the first to do this and incidentally have exclusively partnered with ‘The Mineral Man,’ John Anderson and his. His team that built this research won the Noble Prize in Medicine in 20009. The two were featured in a 12 page spread in Popular Science magazine for their groundbreaking work in August, 2011. The title of the article was, “The Man Who Stopped Time.” I have a feeling that may be the clue we are looking for when we were doing our ta 65 reviews, in deciding whether or not to purchase it. Here is another great article on Dr. Bill.
Dr. Bill and his team at Sierra Sciences found its first telomerase inducer called C0057684. It was first ever discovered that activates the telomerase enzyme gene without killing the cells. Efforts are presently underway to learn everything possible about C0057684. But in addition, C0057684 has provided Sierra Sciences with the first positive control ever for detection of telomerase gene activity in normal human cells. This has served as a very powerful tool for the development of robust high throughput screening assays for finding additional telomerase inducers.
Whats most notable is that before meeting master herbalist & ‘mineral man’, John Anderson, Dr. Bill Andrews and Sierra Sciences only found one hit that activated telomerase in the human body that protects telomeres; much like ta 65 and their one plant phytochemical.
Unlike ta 65, after working with John Anderson, Dr. Bill Andrews and his team have found the following:
“We have screened 254, 593 compounds. We have found 858 telomerase inducers.”
Before partnering with John, it would take Bill and his team 10,000 tries to get a hit that would induce telomerase. Out of the first 11 organic plant compounds John sent to Bill and his team (triple blind so they wouldn’t know) to test, they got 8 hits activating telomerase. That is already 7 above ta 65. I guess the proof is in the pudding.
Now getting to the meat of it. In our ta 65 reviews, what we’ve found is that it only uses one Telomerase activator, Astragalus. Ta 65 is a naturally occurring single molecule found in the ancient Chinese herb Astragalus. T.A. Sciences has developed a proprietary process to refine and purify ta 65. Their process begins with tons of plant material harvested from selected farms in one small region in China.
Sierra Sciences, who has partnered exlcusively with John Anderson and his team in creation of its groundbreaking Telomere support suppliment, Product B as found 858 telomerase inducers, as opposed to 1 telomerase activator in the ta 65 product.
It seems Dr. Bill Andrews and John Anderson clearly have the superior firepower, and far more testimonials to back it up, but what about the cost comparison to ta 65?
Looking into this, we found that Product B can be purchased at wholesale for as little as $69. A monthly supply of ta 65 comes to $219. Pretty much a no-brainer from a cost stand point.
As far as testimonials go, we’ll save that for another post. I’ve found significantly more testimonials for Product B than with our ta 65 reviews, even though its official launch was in August, 2011.
In my opinion, based on weighing the science and the facts, ta 65 is a stellar product, but we found Product B to be far superior.
You can learn more on youthful aging, telomeres, & Product B HERE
1. Paul L. Diet, nutrition and telomere length. J Nutr Biochem 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2010.12.001
Dr. Bill Andrews, Sierra Sciences, 2011 http://SierraSci.com
2. Hayflick L. (1965). The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains. Exp. Cell Res. 37 (3): 614-636.
3. Olovnikov AM. Principle of marginotomy in template synthesis of polynucleotides. Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR. 1971; 201(6):1496-9.Â Watson, J. D. Origin of concatemeric T7 DNA. Nat New Biol. 1972; 239(94):197-201.
4. Cawthon, R. M., K. R. Smith, et al. (2003). “Association between telomere length in blood and mortality in people aged 60 years or older.” Lancet 361(9355): 393-5.
5. Adapted from: Tsuji, A., A. Ishiko, et al. (2002). “Estimating age of humans based on telomere shortening.” Forensic Sci Int 126(3): 197-9.
6. Bodnar, et al. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science, 1998.
7. Funk, et al. Telomerase Expression Restores Dermal Integrity to in Vitro-Aged Fibroblasts in a Reconstituted Skin Model. Experimental Cell Research, 2000
8. Tomas, et al. Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Delays Aging in Cancer-Resistant Mice. Cell, 2008.
9. Jiang, X.-R. et al. Telomerase expression in human somatic cells does not induce changes associated with a transformed phenotype. Nature Genet., 21, 111-114 (1999); Morales, C.P., et. al. Absence of cancer-associated changes in human fibroblasts immortalized with telomerase. Nature Genet., 21, 115-118 (1999); Harley, C. B. Telomerase is not an oncogene. Oncogene 21(4): 494-502 (2002). TA 65
You're missing the point. The ingredients in Product 8 are not expensive, and anyone can buy them over the counter. The reason Product 8 is so expensive (t- 65 is even worse) is it's a pyramid selling system. MLM always has been, and always will be a scam designed to fleece gullible people. So please don't use lame excuses like 'you be right, I'll be healthy'.
As I said nothing wrong with the ingredients in Product 8. They don't activate telomerase, but they're all health promoting. It's just that when they're sold through a MLM outfit like Isagenix they simply can't help being vastly overpriced..
Why would anyone buy or give any credibility to anything even remotely associated with MLM. Pyramid selling is always shonky. I've no doubt product B is an excellent general tonic and anitoxidant. So it may well be a telomere 'SUPPORTER'. But the claim that it is a telomerase activator is nonsense. And you can make your own identical mix for about 100th of what you pay for it as Product B
I dont stand to profit from what I have to say where David probably gets paid for connecting you to mfg of product B. Please search National Institute of Health NIH for double blinded placebo controlled studies. Testimonials are not reliable or science based. TA 65 is the only supplement proven to add length to short telomeres. The vitamins he listed will help along with carnosine, ginkgo biloba, purslane, and carnitine to slow the shortening but they have not proven to add length. Check out LEF.ofg and Dr Dave Imortality Edge. Product B has not been tested in a NIH double blinded placebo controlled study.
http://davidemil.isagenix.com/ca/en/company_associate.dhtml You appear to be an independent associate for isagenix so based on you claiming you have nothing to do with the company????
Hi, I have read the article. Interesting. I'd like to know like others, though, are you an affiliate of Sierra Sciences?
John Anderson never won a Nobel prize. He wasn't mentioned in the Popular Science article that you quote. However, he *does* own Isagenix, the network marketing company that sells Product B, and that you make income from as an "associate".
Product B is just a mixture of antioxidant and vitamins, sounds like a push promotion of product B. Ta 65 is a far cry better. These people with product B are so cheaply aggressive.
MLM products generally have excessive amounts of testimonials. Gullibles and desperates believe them
This post needs to be proof read. You want to be taken seriously, but can't bother to check a simple blog post for errors?!
Having done a lot of reading I believe TA-65 is cycloastrogenol. I believe Geron has a patent for method of use, which means you cannot sell cycloastrogenol and make that claim unless you are TA-65 which wierd. You may as well buy cycloastrogenol. Having said that TA-65 is meant to be well made. I noticed one of their specialists Dr Vagnini has issues with Fraud and the NY medical board. I think these guys make a lot of money playing off people's fears. People are actually better of just being healthy or taking vitamins. If you have the money why not thought, unless it causes cancer ?
@kneebraceboy Unless you're an herbal formulator, you really don't earn the right to an opinion on the ingredients, because people with that knowledge (& those that have mentored with these folks) know its where its sourced (quality) & how its put together.
Also, the 300+ 3rd party studies on Product B, suggest all your saying to be patently false.
Lastly, there are times when mlm companies source a product around a business model. I started using these products because it was a science company first. The ingredients were to exotic to put on the shelves, and they required someone's personal testimonial.
Bottomline, if you did your research OR you were part of the nutritional formulation/mineral suppliment world, you would know what you're saying above is false because you'd know who John Anderson is ; )
What if you put all this motivation to be right, into being open to learning something? Maybe you'd even bless yourself with an amazing product experience.
@kneebraceboy I used to feel the same way. Until you've used the product regularly, you don't earn the right to an opinion. So you be right, we'll be healthy ; )
@donjacoby if you read below, you see I only put my personal reputation behind what my family consumes and what I've found to be the best. I wish the restaurants I am passionate about & other businesses all gave me kickbacks...for things I'm going to talk about anyway out of passion! ; )
Also, actually, here are 300 studies we recently participated in on every facet of the subject ; ) Many more on the way http://www.isagenix.com/us/en/file.ashx?id=fcfb13ce-5ab2-42f3-8f39-b4d8af40f3d3
@BlaineMichalsky per my comment below, I never said 'I have nothing to do with the company,'...your words. I said, "I a consumer, and a health student who tries everything, & I recommend what I like best. In this case, it was Isagenix." As a wholesale consumer, they give you your own website ; ) You should read the whole article & see why I recommend it.
@johnbsweet Thanks for the question. No I am absolutely not affiliated in any way with Sierra Sciences. I a consumer, and a health student who tries everything, & I recommend what I like best. In this case, it was Isagenix.
The article never said that he won a noble prize. Check your comprehension before you comment; it was Dr. Bill Andrew's team/colleagues that won it. It was Dr. Andrew's who got the Geron group and ta 65 their start.
from your response, anybody who read the article could tell that you didn't take the time to do so ; )
Exactly...so true. So its critical to research who is at the forefront of telomere research, paving the way, with the most recorded findings in the field ; )
Thanks Anon. Most of my readers could give a crap. They're here for the meat n' tatters ; ) & for fun. I am taken seriously by the ones who take their health (in this case) more seriously than being fault finders. The rest of my articles aren't technical at all; lots of videos, pics, some curse words, & smiley faces ; ) The more you keep it real in my niche the better. Thanks again...hope you found what you were looking for! David
Hi Omare. Thank you for your comment. I am NOT an affiliate of ta 65. This blog is me as an expert and also a consumer with the choice I made and the results I am getting as a consumer of a more superior alternative. To your health, David
Check your own writing, and you'll see how vague/confusing it is. Regardless, this is still a matter of associating your product with someone else who is associated with someone else who won the Nobel prize. (Elizabeth Blackburn, Carol W. Greider and Jack W. Szostak shared the 2009 Nobel in Medicine.)
Fact is, I'm a consumer who always seeks out the best, and when I find it I let my circle know. All you have to do is a good old 'Pepsi Challenge' and see for yourself the landmark difference in results ; )